Bush Vetoes Stem Cell Research bill

[fanatacist]

True that, he was good for argument's sake, even though he did flame. But who cares about flaming anyways? As long as there are facts behind it, in my opinion it's fair play.

[BNU-Judge]

but he knew what he was talking about.

Eh, to a certain point maybe, I can remember a few times, where if he didn't make it up he probably got it from some biased site, but I didn't feel like continuing the argument, but seems like you guys wanted to see how far it went.

[Bnu-Sorceress]

almost all sites are biased. on both sides. its almost impossible to find one that isn't biased in some way.

[John]

Find me a passage on: http://www.battle.net/ that states they are for/against abortion? :-P I'd say they're an unbiased website on the matter. :-P

[fanatacist]

I think he meant all RELATED sites :]

[Bnu-Sorceress]

there is no discussion on their website about it either way. they don't say anything about it. thats completely different lol. but you knew that anyway :-P

[BNU-Judge]

almost all sites are biased. on both sides. its almost impossible to find one that isn't biased in some way.

Key word right there is almost, not all, gotta do the HW but there are a few, that try to be unbiased. Point is not sure if Hazard always knew what he was talking about, maybe he wanted to use whatever info to continue the arguement. Just for the sake of arguing :roll:

[Bnu-Sorceress]

maybe. but i'm willing to bet that both sides has biased information. the bias is an opinion, and an opinion that the person referring to the article shares. therefore its a good source of information to them.